I usually try to avoid this sort of chastising, but I could not resist to comment on this story. As reported by various news organizations, former First Lady Barbara Bush paid a visit to hurricane evacuees who are currently seeking shelter inside the Astrodome in Houston and made some very Marie Antoinette-esque comments towards the evacuees. Here is one of the quotes: 'What I'm hearing, which is sort of scary, is they all want to stay in Texas. Everyone is so overwhelmed by the hospitality.' The first part of that statement smacks of plain ignorance. What is so scary about them wanting to stay in Texas? These people have lost everything and have nowhere else to go. It will take months for New Orleans to get back to some semblance of normalcy. Are you afraid that they're all going to become wards of the state and become a burden to the taxpayers? Think about how this country grew. People moved westward to start new lives and to establish themselves and their families in places they could call home. The hurricane survivors aren't very different, they just have a different set of circumstances.
Here is another quote from the former First Lady: 'And so many of the people in the arena here, you know, were underprivileged anyway, so this -- this is working very well for them.' I don't see what that has to do with the fact that a hurricane came in and swept away everything that they had. There are people of various socio-economic paths that are being sheltered in Texas and other places across the country and how much money you have (or had) doesn't have any bearing on what happened. Did you think Katrina thought itself 'Hmmm. Maybe I'll just take out the poor section of town and spare the rich folks.' Sorry to burst the bubble, but natural disasters (much like alcoholism, drug use or any kind of illness for that matter) don't discriminate. I think that this type of behavior by a former First Lady is very inexcusable and shows that this country still has a ways to go when it concerns not only the economic disparity between the "haves" and "have-nots", but the difference in their respective attitudes and philosophies.